CFP last date
29 June 2026
Call for Paper
July Edition
JAAI solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming July edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 29 June 2026

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

A Governance-Centric Zero Trust Framework for Secure Remote Work: Integrating Compliance-by-Design, Digital Sovereignty, and Socio-Technical Resilience in Distributed Enterprise Architectures

by Justice Opara-Martins
Journal of Advanced Artificial Intelligence
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 2 - Number 6
Year of Publication: 2026
Authors: Justice Opara-Martins

Justice Opara-Martins . A Governance-Centric Zero Trust Framework for Secure Remote Work: Integrating Compliance-by-Design, Digital Sovereignty, and Socio-Technical Resilience in Distributed Enterprise Architectures. Journal of Advanced Artificial Intelligence. 2, 6 ( May 2026), 42-62. DOI=None

@article{ None,
author = { Justice Opara-Martins },
title = { A Governance-Centric Zero Trust Framework for Secure Remote Work: Integrating Compliance-by-Design, Digital Sovereignty, and Socio-Technical Resilience in Distributed Enterprise Architectures },
journal = { Journal of Advanced Artificial Intelligence },
issue_date = { May 2026 },
volume = { 2 },
number = { 6 },
month = { May },
year = { 2026 },
pages = { 42-62 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://jaaionline.phdfocus.com/archives/volume2/number6/a-governance-centric-zero-trust-framework-for-secure-remote-work/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2026-05-31T02:56:50.147276+05:30
%A Justice Opara-Martins
%T A Governance-Centric Zero Trust Framework for Secure Remote Work: Integrating Compliance-by-Design, Digital Sovereignty, and Socio-Technical Resilience in Distributed Enterprise Architectures
%J Journal of Advanced Artificial Intelligence
%V 2
%N 6
%P 42-62
%D 2026
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The rapid expansion of distributed remote work ecosystems has fundamentally transformed enterprise cybersecurity governance, operational resilience, and digital infrastructure management. While remote and hybrid working models have improved organisational flexibility and productivity, they have simultaneously intensified cyber risk exposure through decentralised endpoints, fragmented governance controls, expanded attack surfaces, and increasingly sophisticated threat vectors. Existing cybersecurity governance approaches frequently emphasise technical controls without sufficiently integrating socio-technical resilience, digital sovereignty, regulatory interoperability, and governance-centric Zero Trust architectures. This study proposes a Governance-Centric Zero Trust Framework (GCZTF) integrating Compliance-by-Design governance, digital sovereignty principles, socio-technical resilience engineering, and adaptive security orchestration for secure remote work ecosystems. A mixed-method research methodology combining comparative framework analysis, governance maturity evaluation, qualitative thematic synthesis, and scenario-based implementation modelling was adopted to evaluate the proposed framework across healthcare, financial services, telecommunications, and public-sector environments. The findings demonstrate that governance-centric Zero Trust architectures significantly improve organisational resilience, compliance readiness, operational visibility, incident response efficiency, and long-term cybersecurity sustainability. The study further establishes that cybersecurity governance must evolve beyond conventional perimeter-centric security paradigms toward integrated governance ecosystems capable of supporting resilient distributed enterprise infrastructures. The proposed framework contributes theoretically by extending Zero Trust governance into a socio-technical and sovereignty-oriented paradigm while operationally providing a scalable implementation architecture for secure remote work governance. The research therefore establishes a unified governance-oriented pathway for resilient cybersecurity transformation within modern distributed enterprise environments.

References
  1. P. Mell and T. Grance, “The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011. Available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-145.pdf
  2. M. Armbrust et al., “A View of Cloud Computing,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 50–58, 2010. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1721654.1721672
  3. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), “Remote Working Security Guidelines,” 2023. Available: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications
  4. Cisco Systems, “Hybrid Work Security Report,” 2024. Available: https://www.cisco.com
  5. IBM Security, “Cost of a Data Breach Report,” 2024. Available: https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach
  6. Verizon, “Data Breach Investigations Report,” 2024. Available: https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir
  7. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Zero Trust Architecture,” NIST SP 800-207, 2020. Available: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-207/final
  8. European Commission, “General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR),” 2018. Available: https://gdpr-info.eu
  9. ISO/IEC 27001:2022, “Information Security Management Systems Requirements,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/27001
  10. Gartner Research, “Cybersecurity Governance for Hybrid Enterprises,” 2024. Available: https://www.gartner.com
  11. Deloitte Insights, “Cyber Governance in Distributed Enterprises,” 2024. Available: https://www2.deloitte.com
  12. ISACA, “Enterprise Cybersecurity Governance Framework,” 2023. Available: https://www.isaca.org/resources
  13. Cloud Security Alliance, “Security Guidance for Critical Areas of Focus in Cloud Computing,” Version 5.0, 2024. Available: https://cloudsecurityalliance.org
  14. S. Rose, O. Borchert, S. Mitchell, and S. Connelly, “Zero Trust Architecture,” NIST Special Publication 800-207, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-207
  15. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. Available: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  16. Accenture Research, “Zero Trust Security Transformation,” 2024. Available: https://www.accenture.com
  17. McKinsey & Company, “Cybersecurity and Remote Work Governance,” 2024. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com
  18. KPMG, “Compliance-by-Design in Digital Enterprises,” 2024. Available: https://kpmg.com
  19. E. Hollnagel, Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2018. Available: https://www.routledge.com
  20. World Economic Forum, “Global Cybersecurity Outlook,” 2025. Available: https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-cybersecurity-outlook-2025
  21. OECD, “Digital Sovereignty and Cyber Governance,” 2024. Available: https://www.oecd.org/digital
  22. GAIA-X European Association, “Digital Sovereignty Framework,” 2024. Available: https://gaia-x.eu
  23. Microsoft Security, “Zero Trust Adoption Framework,” 2024. Available: https://learn.microsoft.com/security/zero-trust
  24. Palo Alto Networks, “The State of Hybrid Workforce Security,” 2024. Available: https://www.paloaltonetworks.com
  25. Forrester Research, “The Future of Zero Trust Platforms,” 2024. Available: https://www.forrester.com
  26. CrowdStrike, “Global Threat Report,” 2024. Available: https://www.crowdstrike.com/global-threat-report
  27. Cisco Talos Intelligence Group, “Annual Cybersecurity Trends Report,” 2024. Available: https://blog.talosintelligence.com
  28. AWS Security, “Cloud Security Best Practices,” 2024. Available: https://aws.amazon.com/security
  29. Google Cloud, “BeyondCorp and Zero Trust Enterprise Security,” 2024. Available: https://cloud.google.com/beyondcorp
  30. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), “Threat Landscape Report,” 2024. Available: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/threat-risk-management/threats-and-trends
  31. SANS Institute, “Security Awareness Report,” 2024. Available: https://www.sans.org/security-awareness-training/resources
  32. PwC, “Digital Trust Insights,” 2024. Available: https://www.pwc.com
  33. Capgemini Research Institute, “Cybersecurity Transformation in Hybrid Enterprises,” 2024. Available: https://www.capgemini.com/research
  34. Check Point Research, “State of Global Cybersecurity,” 2024. Available: https://research.checkpoint.com
  35. MIT Sloan Management Review, “Cyber Resilience in the Age of Hybrid Work,” 2024. Available: https://sloanreview.mit.edu
  36. Harvard Business Review, “Managing Cybersecurity in Distributed Organisations,” 2024. Available: https://hbr.org
  37. International Telecommunication Union (ITU), “Global Cybersecurity Index,” 2024. Available: https://www.itu.int
  38. European Commission, “NIS2 Directive,” 2023. Available: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
  39. National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), “Zero Trust Architecture Design Principles,” 2024. Available: https://www.ncsc.gov.uk
  40. IBM Institute for Business Value, “Cyber Resilience and Governance,” 2024. Available: https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Zero Trust Architecture Cybersecurity Governance Secure Remote Work Digital Sovereignty Compliance-by-Design Socio-Technical Resilience Distributed Enterprise Security Governance Architecture